Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama?
Either way, it's the only certain, bullet-proof way of preventing a Republican White House for the third term in a row. The tit for tat sniping that's been taking place since the beginning of the year, suddenly stopped on debate night.
Have the two camps realised that only one of them will win on Super Tuesday and that a united front has greater odds of winning than a splitting down party lines.
Tell The Truthiness ; There's no chance of that happening with McCain and Romney.
2 comments:
YES YES YES - Clinton / Obama, of course. What would be best is if Clinton would agree to only 4 years and Obama would run for the next 4. He has the statesmen-ship, he needs the experience. Right now he is all slogan, no meat. But he could get the meat by using Clinton, the shark!
Talk about a metaphor! The republicans could be clever and have a Jaws-themed negative ad campaign, 'just when you thought it was safe to go back in the voting booth/ safe to let the democrats back in the White House'.
Well, we will see what happens tomorrow!
"We need a bigger campaign bus"
Post a Comment